Revision as of 14:38, 16 November 2004 edit Doradus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 6,033 edits →Silly section: Agreed ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:40, 16 November 2004 edit undo Doradus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 6,033 edits →Silly section: This article needs a cleanup Next edit →
Line 16: :I agree. The section is a sales pitch. Eiffel leans more toward clarity (over efficiency for example) than many other languages, but this section as it stands doesn't explain that very well. There are probably a couple of nuggets in that section that could be reworked into the article a different way, but on the whole I think the article would be improved by this section's deletion. --[[User:P3d0\|P3d0]] 14:38, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC) :Really, this article needs a serious cleanup. The trouble is, I have found that computer science articles don't stay cleaned up for long. Well-meaning CS people come along and add in their opinions, seemingly unaware that they are not objective facts. That's why I have turned my attention more towards science and astronomy articles lately. :-) --[[User:P3d0\|P3d0]] 14:40, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)

Talk:Eiffel (programming language): Difference between revisions