Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantelides algorithm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
keep |
|||
Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
:{{la|Pantelides algorithm}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantelides algorithm|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December
:({{Find sources AFD|Pantelides algorithm}})
There is both little evidence of significance, and only the lead sentence ''might'' be appropriate in a good article about the subject. No reliable sources are provided other than [1], which provides partial evidence of existence, not of notability. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 09:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Line 13:
*'''Keep'''. Google scholar shows 584 citations to the original publication of this algorithm, and 182 publications using the exact phrase "Pantelides algorithm", making it clearly notable. The fact that our current article is a stub in need of expansion is not a valid reason for deletion. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 06:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. The algorithm is a core one in the simulation of dynamic systems. The article is a stub (created by me some years ago) and needs expansion rather than deletion. [[User:Jdpipe|Jdpipe]] ([[User talk:Jdpipe|talk]]) 23:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Natg 19|Natg 19]] ([[User talk:Natg 19|talk]]) 01:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Pantelides algorithm]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
| |||