Kernel Patch Protection: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:01, 17 December 2016

Revision as of 00:51, 1 January 2017

Line 182:

|accessdate=5 October 2007

}}</ref> [[Grisoft]] AVG,<ref>{{cite web

|url=http://www.grisoft.com/doc/324/us/crp/3

|title=AVG Anti-Virus and Internet Security - Supported Platforms

|publisher=[[Grisoft]]

|accessdate=5 October 2007

|archiveurl = httphttps://web.archive.org/web/20070827082857/http://www2.grisoft.com/doc/324/us/crp/3 <!-- Bot retrieved archive -->
|archivedate = 27 August 2007
|deadurl=yes
|df=
}}</ref> [[Avast Software|avast!]], [[Avira|Avira Anti-Vir]] and [[Sophos]] do not patch the kernel in default configurations, but may patch the kernel when features such as "advanced process protection" or "prevent unauthorized termination of processes" are enabled.

<ref>{{cite news

|first=Robert

Line 301 ⟶ 305:

==External links==

*[https://web.archive.org/web/20070217053224/http://www.windows-now.com:80/blogs/robert/archive/2006/08/12/PatchGuard-and-Symantecs-Complaints-About-Windows-Vista.aspx The Truth About PatchGuard: Why Symantec Keeps Complaining]{{dl|date=September 2016}}

*[https://web.archive.org/web/20061124094344/http://blogs.msdn.com:80/windowsvistasecurity/archive/2006/08/11/695993.aspx An Introduction to Kernel Patch Protection]{{dl|date=September 2016}}

*[https://web.archive.org/web/20070205155710/http://www.microsoft.com:80/security/windowsvista/allchin.mspx Microsoft executive clarifies recent market confusion about Windows Vista Security]{{dl|date=September 2016}}

*[http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/kernel/64bitpatch_FAQ.mspx Kernel Patch Protection: Frequently Asked Questions]

*[https://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2006/08/12/446104.aspx Windows Vista x64 Security – Pt 2 – Patchguard]