Content deleted Content added
→Should clarify any distinction from SIDM: new section |
→Should clarify any distinction from SIDM: undo own - a different SIDM |
||
Line 64:
Reference 12 in "SIMPs annhilations would produce significant heat. DAMA set limits with NaITl crystals.[12]" doesn't seem to support this sentence but instead refers to heat flow in Uranus, which is covered in the next paragraph/sentence which is referenced by [13]. Do we need change the referencing? [[User:RJFJR|RJFJR]] ([[User talk:RJFJR|talk]]) 15:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
: I think so. I've moved ref 12 and flagged it. - [[User:Rod57|Rod57]] ([[User talk:Rod57|talk]]) 14:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
|