Revision as of 04:56, 16 September 2006 edit Omegatron (talk \| contribs) Administrators 35,823 edits →Security vulnerabilities: «+{{citation needed}}» actually, one of the references shows someone testing it on themselves and it doesn't raise the score at all ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:13, 20 September 2006 edit undo 142.179.125.54 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 49: * [http://dsv.su.se/jpalme/ietf/mhtml.html Using HTML in E-mail] * [http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-HTMLThreading-0105 HTML Threading: Conventions for use of HTML in email] * [http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Configuring Mail Clients to Send Plain ASCII Text] — Argues that HTML (and MIME in general) should never be used in mail * [http://home.earthlink.net/~bobbau/email/avoiding-html/ Configuring Your E-mail Software to Avoid Sending HTML-formatted Messages] * [http://birdhouse.org/etc/evilmail.html Why HTML in E-Mail is a Bad Idea] (written in the late 90s) [http://birdhouse.org/etc/html_mail_counter.html Rebuttal] [http://birdhouse.org/blog/2006/01/15/html-email-the-poll/ HTML Email: The Poll] — January 2006 poll and comments on whether the original document is still relevant * [http://momentum.insertdisc.com/archives/2004/09/17/html_email_still_evil_part_1.html HTML Email — Still Evil?] (2004) * [http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil_still.shtml HTML e-mail is STILL evil!!!] * [http://www.evolt.org/article/HTML_Email_Isn_t_Rich/25/53732/ HTML Email Isn't Rich] (2003) * [http://dsv.su.se/jpalme/ietf/mhtml-discussion.html Do we really want to send web pages in e-mail?] * [http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0000Pb&topic_id=1 HTML in Email] — Ask E.T. Forum (2003)

HTML email: Difference between revisions