Talk:Gheorghe Funar: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 117:
::::: * I will also subscribe to the idea that Hungarians had a positive influence on Transylvania, as a region. They just had a very negative attitude towards the majority of its population, i.e. the Romanians. Fortunately this sort of racism is now long gone, but this doesn't mean that one can put ‘victims of Hungarian oppression’ in quotation marks. Just as one cannot put victims of the Holocaust in quotation marks.
::::: * The archaeologists said more than once that they found very interesting things on that site. But archaeology is not a "cool" activity for everyone and of course that not finding 100 kg of gold in there was a disappointment for the press. It is however true that the hole shouldn't have been left in there for so long. And I totally agree with that.
::::: * It is not shameful to admit when you are wrong and it is a virtue to correct your own mistakes. Reasons like ''the photoessay will not change, for it is written in a travelogue, and one obviously doesn't change those afterward'' only shows a lack of flexibility. Evolution is part of human nature! Shall we all understand therethat you are not after the truth, but you just want to advertise your first and WRONG impressions from a travelogue using Wikipedia?
::::: * I suggest you keep your travelogue for yourself, create another page using its good photographs, but changing its unacceptable text, and then put it as an external link for this article. [[User:Alexrap|Alexrap]] 11:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC)