Content deleted Content added
Learnerktm (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
→Random Sampling: ce |
||
Line 20:
To express this same idea statistically - If a randomly assigned group is compared to the [[average|mean]] it may be discovered that they differ, even though they were assigned from the same group. If a test of [[statistical significance]] is applied to randomly assigned groups to test the difference between sample [[average|mean]]s against the [[null hypothesis]] that they are equal to the same population mean (i.e., population mean of differences = 0), given the probability distribution, the null hypothesis will sometimes be "rejected," that is, deemed not plausible. That is, the groups will be sufficiently different on the variable tested to conclude statistically that they did not come from the same population, even though, procedurally, they were assigned from the same total group. For example, using random assignment may create an assignment to groups that has 20 blue-eyed people and 5 brown-eyed people in one group. This is a rare event under random assignment, but it could happen, and when it does it might add some doubt to the causal agent in the experimental hypothesis.
==Random
Random sampling is a related, but distinct process.<ref name="socialresearchmethods.net">{{cite web|url=http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/random.php}}</ref> Random sampling
==History==
|