Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2L programming language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
CAT |
del |
||
Line 29:
****Yeah, I figured that out. But as I've now commented on other AFDs for esolangs, if these are not used, not notable, and just something invented at school in one day, then they shouldn't even be on the list, as they are nothing beyond a nerdjoke. Speedy Keep is still a ridiculous vote, given the reasoning which suggests a delete or redirect. - [[User:Hahnchen|Hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><font color="green">e</font></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 17:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Anything of worth is covered in Brainfuck. No assertion of anything. Speedy Keep is the stupidest vote I've seen. - [[User:Hahnchen|Hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><font color="green">e</font></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 17:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Per my comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages]]. —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 19:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
| |||