Collaborative method: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m restore lead from oldid=514837000
m clean up, replaced: Cambridge, MA → Cambridge, Massachusetts using AWB
Line 9:
 
==Group models==
Four group models are common in collaboration:<ref name="spencelecture">Spence, Muneera U. ''"Graphic Design: Collaborative Processes = Understanding Self and Others."'' (lecture) Art 325: Collaborative Processes. Fairbanks Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. 13 Apr. 2006.</ref>
;Chance
:''Collaboration by chance'' is the most basic model and underlies all four. The team is a random pick of whoever is available without any specific regard for the skills or needs of each member.
Line 81:
[[File:Evaluating-thinking-styles.png|thumb|upright|A chart used to evaluate the thinking style of persons, particularly for use in collaborative teams.]]
 
There are two main components of thinking styles: internal and external,{{citation needed|date=January 2013}} they share similarities to the [[extraversion and introversion]] traits seen in human [[Personality psychology|personalities]]. The two thinking styles are dichotomies and can be used as axes when charting personal evaluation; note that "there is no 'right' place on the grid."<ref name="spencelecture" />
 
==== Creation of ideas ====
Line 236:
 
== Further reading ==
* Bennis, Warren, and Patricia W. Biederman. ''Organizing Genius.'' Cambridge, MAMassachusetts: Perseus, 1997.
* Marcum, James W. ''After the Information Age: A Dynamic Learning Manifesto.'' Vol. 231. Counterpoints: Studies in the Postmodern Theory of Education. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2006.
* Spence, Muneera U. ''"Graphic Design Collaborative Processes: a Course in Collaboration."'' Oregon State University. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: AIGA, 2005. http://revolutionphiladelphia.aiga.org/resources/content/2/5/7/0/documents/MSpence.pdf