Inductive programming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:30, 6 April 2017

Revision as of 17:29, 10 April 2017

Line 78:

</ref> The results in terms of learnability were related to classical concepts, such as identification-in-the-limit, as introduced in the seminal work of Gold.<ref>

{{cite journal

|first1=E.M.
|last1=Gold

|title=Language identification in the limit

|publisher=Elsevier

|journal=Information and Control

|volume=10
|issue=5
|pages=447–474

|url=http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/paper/gold67limit.html

|year=1967
|doi=10.1016/s0019-9958(67)91165-5}}

|deadurl=yes

|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090125120159/http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/paper/gold67limit.html

|archivedate=2009-01-25

|df=

}}

</ref> More recently, the language learning problem was addressed by the inductive programming community.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=Stephen|last1=Muggleton|title=Inductive Logic Programming: Issues, Results and the Challenge of Learning Language in Logic|journal=Artificial Intelligence|volume=114|pages=283–296|year=1999|doi=10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00067-3}}; here: Sect.2.1</ref><ref>

{{cite journal