Wikipedia:Content policies and guidelines in a nutshell: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
deleted cause I wanted to |
m Undid revision 774382723 by Coolperson246 (talk) Vandalism |
||
Line 1:
{{infopage|WP:NUTSHELL}}
Articles [[WP:NOT|appropriate]] for this [[WP:ENC|encyclopedia]], [[WP:CITE|cite]] [[WP:V|verifiable]] claims from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] ([[WP:NPOV|in proportion]]), without presenting [[WP:NOR|our own claims]].
==[[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]==
Claims should come from published sources that can be verified by other Wikipedia editors.
==[[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]]==
Verifiable claims should be based on references released by established experts and/or publishers with editorial oversight that have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
==[[Wikipedia:Citing sources]]==
Citing verifiable reliable sources is necessary for editors to verify the claims and assess the reliability of the references.
==[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]==
Wikipedia articles should present the claims and opinions appearing in the published body of reliable sources, in proportion to their prominence.
==[[Wikipedia:No original research]]==
Claims must be verifiable in reliable references; consequently, editors may not insert their opinion or analysis of a subject into Wikipedia articles, explicitly or through presentation.
==[[Wikipedia:Notability]]==
Wikipedia articles require enough reliable independent sources to justify a complete article. There are subjects that possess enough sources to build some kind of article, but [[WP:NOT|what Wikipedia is not]] still applies.
==Also see==
* [[Wikipedia:Nutshell]]
| |||