Revision as of 18:07, 9 April 2017 edit Marc van Leeuwen (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 2,666 edits →Ruler function?? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:18, 9 September 2017 edit undo Norbornene (talk \| contribs) 145 edits →Formal proof of continuity: Responded to talk page section Next edit →
Line 60: The next step would be to investigate copyright issues for these proofs. Or possibly rewrite them to avoid copyright issues.</small></small> --[[User:Nickalh50\|Nickalh50]] ([[User talk:Nickalh50\|talk]]) 19:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC) :Hi guys. I rewrote the proofs and put them in collapse boxes. I believe that the proofs are complete and precise now. Copyright problems shouldn't be an issue; I used only this article as a guide. (Any constructive criticism on my math writing would be greatly appreciated.) :Actually I started an hour or two ago by deleting the "Integrability" section, since it made the obviously false statement that the Thomae function is only discontinuous on the rationals. I'm wiser now. 04:18, 9 September 2017 (UTC) == Naming convention? ==

Talk:Thomae's function: Difference between revisions