Talk:Universal Windows Platform apps: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:56, 10 May 2017

Revision as of 00:05, 11 May 2017

Line 290:

:::#Same mistake for the fourth time: Take any UWP app you like. Take it back in time to 2012. People will call it Metro-style app.

:::#Deliberate! It is not clear beyond doubt that Microsoft intended to use "modern" as a title or simply as an adjective, for advertisement and appeal. Microsoft itself implies that the latter is true but of course, mainstream media has downplayed this aspect.

:::#Same mistake for the fifth time: The article does not claim the contrary. But of course, this could be aI bea good addition.

:::#And this last one is the evidence that you are running away with yourself: First you assume this article is about all "Windows app" and then criticize its failure to meet this standard that is only in your head.

:::[[User:FleetCommand|'''<span style="color:#FCC200">Fleet</span>'''<span style="color:#FC00C2">Command</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FleetCommand|<span style="color:#00C2FC">Speak your mind!</span>]])</small> 22:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

::::#I believe the article in it's current state is already failing [[WP:V]] by stating Windows 8.X is part of UWP. By failing to even have an article in general about "Windows apps", we violate [[WP:NPOV]] by promoting UWP as the only app solution on Windows. These statements I made are easily verifiable by [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/porting/ this site] which is obviously [[WP:RS]].

::::#Isn't information on how apps are brought to the UWP important? Again we violate [[WP:NPOV]] by only stating that apps can be brought from 8.x to UWP instead of the other methods.

::::#There aren't any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that states UWP is simply a new name for metro-style app (because it isn't!!). You can still run these so-called metro-style apps (aka Windows Runtime 8.X, universal or not) apps in Windows 10 w/o porting to UWP

::::#But it was a name and thus if we take a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] then we should include it no matter how "advertising" Microsoft makes it or how the media tries to avoid that

::::#Notice that [[Windows_apps]] links here.

::::<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #03A9F4, -4px -4px 15px #4CAF50;"><font color="black">WikIan [[User:WikIan|-]]([[User talk:WikIan|talk]])</font></span> 00:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)