Revision as of 20:52, 28 September 2006 edit David D. (talk \| contribs) 11,585 edits →Do these pass the smell test for articles? Looking for feedback ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:01, 28 September 2006 edit undo NATTO (talk \| contribs) 1,309 edits →Do these pass the smell test for articles? Looking for feedback Next edit →
Line 705: ::::::: The article mentioned above are not real article, just a name with a very brief description. That is clear to anyone. [[User:NATTO\|NATTO]] 20:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC) :::::::: I'm confused? I agree and that's why i think a redirect would be appropriate. Do you think the redirects should be avoided? [[User:David D.\|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.\|(Talk)]] 20:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC) :::::::: Redirect to QW or Barrett ? QW website already offers access to all the secondary sites. Reader have access to the website through a link in the QW article. Is it one of WP purpose to help promote QW secondary sites ? Especially when the "article" you wish to redirect are not even real articles... [[User:NATTO\|NATTO]] 21:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Stephen Barrett: Difference between revisions