Content deleted Content added
Sapphorain (talk | contribs) |
→Table: new section |
||
Line 144:
: Dear [[Special:Contributions/88.69.187.201|88.69.187.201]]. But yes, there definitely is a need for a reliable independent source, first about the notion you wish to introduce, and secondly about the proof you propose. Your own proof about a notion you might have invented is not an acceptable source. You appear to be making a confusion between an encyclopedia and a math blog. Kind regards. [[User:Sapphorain|Sapphorain]] ([[User talk:Sapphorain#top|talk]]) 17:40, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
== Table ==
I do not understand, why Anita5912 reverted my new table.
The new table is much better understandable than the old ones. It contains all functions up to x=4 and explains all the eaxmples in the text.
It also contains the prime factorization of ''n'', which helps readers to understand the formulas. [[User:Wolfk.wk|Wolfk.wk]] ([[User talk:Wolfk.wk|talk]]) 17:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
|