Revision as of 22:40, 21 August 2017 edit Martin of Sheffield (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 17,305 edits →test cases: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:48, 22 August 2017 edit undo Trappist the monk (talk \| contribs) Administrators 494,597 edits →test cases Next edit →
Line 104: Hi. I've just run the test cases against some small changes to the code in the sandbox, with lamentable results. I reverted my changes and the test cases still fail. Is this expected? Alternatively, should I copy the main code into the sandbox to ensure that the sandbox code is up to date? I don't want to damage anyone else's work. Regards, [[User:Martin of Sheffield\|Martin of Sheffield]] ([[User talk:Martin of Sheffield\|talk]]) 22:40, 21 August 2017 (UTC) :The {{tlx\|sfn}} tests have never 'passed' as far as I know because two {{tld\|sfn}} templates with identical input parameters must be separately distinguishable from each other else the back-links won't work. Two instances of the same template: ::<code><nowiki>{{sfn\|brown\|red\|orange\|2017}}</nowiki></code> :produce: ::<code><nowiki><sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEbrownredorange2017_1-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEbrownredorange2017-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup></nowiki></code> ::<code><nowiki><sup id="cite_ref-FOOTNOTEbrownredorange2017_1-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-FOOTNOTEbrownredorange2017-1">&#91;1&#93;</a></sup></nowiki></code> :I suspect that the values used in the comparison made by the test code are the values of two stripmarkers: ::<code>'"`UNIQ--ref-0000000A-QINU`"'</code> ::<code>'"`UNIQ--ref-0000000C-QINU`"'</code> :Stripmarkers are replaced with actual content long after the template and module code has run. :—[[User:Trappist the monk\|Trappist the monk]] ([[User talk:Trappist the monk\|talk]]) 09:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Module talk:Footnotes: Difference between revisions