Content deleted Content added
Line 6:
:A single source for discussing TPU devices seems like a good idea as this market grows. However, I am not sure if this is the place. Right now this is focused on the Google TPU products, and would require a distinct re-write to make it generic. I am not opposed to a doing so, but I am not sure if there is a consensus that TPU has been [[genericized]]. (In another context Nvidia has called the same/similar co-processor as a "tensor core" rather than TPU.<ref>https://www.servethehome.com/nvidia-v100-volta-update-hot-chips-2017/</ref>) Another idea might be a hardware accelerator section within the [[TensorFlow]] article, with links to Nvidia and Google product pages. Thoughts? [[User:Dbsseven|Dbsseven]] ([[User talk:Dbsseven|talk]]) 15:38, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
::I would think if independent reliable sources call it a TPU then it would be okay to incorporate the information into this article. News articles may just repeat Nvidia's talking points so it would be best to rely on technical/academic sources. [[User:Sizeofint|Sizeofint]] ([[User talk:Sizeofint|talk]]) 18:33, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
| |||