|
== Exemption from Privacy Act ==
Following the controversial [[Passenger Name Record]] agreement signed with the [[European Union]] (EU) in 2007, the [[Presidency of George W. Bush|Bush administration]] proposed to exempt the Automated Targeting System from the requirements of the [[1974 Privacy Act]] for access to records and for an accounting of disclosures.<ref name=Exemption>[[Statewatch]], [http://www.statewatch.org/news/2007/sep/04eu-usa-pnr-exemptions.htm US changes the privacy rules to exemption access to personal data] September 2007</ref> Those proposed exemptions were finalized on February 3, 2010.<ref name=ExemptionFinalized>PapersPlease.org, [http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2010/02/08/dhs-exempts-dossiers-used-for-targeting-from-the-privacy-act/ DHS exempts dossiers used for “targeting”"targeting" from the Privacy Act] February 2010</ref>
== Litigation ==
Lawsuits have been filed under both the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) seeking disclosure of information about ATS as well as records from ATS dossiers about individuals.
'''EFF v. Department of Homeland Security'''
'''EFF v. Department of Homeland Security:''' <blockquote>On December 19, 2006, the Electronic Frontier Foundation's FOIA Litigation for Accountable Government (FLAG) project filed suit against the Department of Homeland Security under FOIA, demanding "immediate answers about an invasive and unprecedented data-mining system deployed on American travelers."<ref>[https://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_12.php#005045 Press Releases: December, 2006 | Electronic Frontier Foundation<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061231080513/http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_12.php#005045 |date=December 31, 2006 }}</ref></blockquote>
'''Shearson v. Department of Homeland Security'''
'''Shearson v. Department of Homeland Security:''' <blockquote>In June 2006, Julia Shearson, Executive Director of the Cleveland Chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) filed suit pro se against the DHS under the Privacy Act, seeking disclosure of records about herself from ATS and the correction of erroneous records falsely characterizing her as a terrorist.<ref>[http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2011/04/21/dhs-cant-opt-out-of-liability-for-violating-the-privacy-act/ DHS can't opt out of liability for violating the Privacy Act | PapersPlease.org: April 21, 2011]</ref></blockquote>
'''In 't Veld v. Department of Homeland Security'''
'''In 't Veld v. Department of Homeland Security:''' <blockquote>On July 1, 2008, the EFF FLAG project filed suit against the DHS under FOIA on behalf of Sophie In 't Veld, a Member of the European Parliament from the Netherlands, seeking disclosure of records about herself from ATS and other systems of records.<ref>[https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/07/01 European Lawmaker Sues U.S. Agencies to Obtain Travel-Related and Other Personal Information: Lawsuit Tests U.S. Assurances of Access Rights for EU Citizens | Electronic Frontier Foundation: July 1, 2008]</ref></blockquote>
'''Hasbrouck v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection'''
'''Hasbrouck v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection:''' <blockquote>On August 25, 2010, Edward Hasbrouck of the Identity Project (PapersPlease.org) filed suit against CBP under the Privacy Act and FOIA, seeking disclosure of records about himself from ATS, information about how ATS records are retrieved, and records related to the processing of his previous Privacy Act requests and appeals for ATS records. Mr. Hasb rouck was represented by the First Amendment Project.<ref>[http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2011hasbrouck-v-cbp/ Edward Hasbrouck v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection | PapersPlease.org]{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref></blockquote>
'''Gellman v. Department of Homeland Security et al.'''
'''Gellman v. Department of Homeland Security et al.:''' <blockquote>On April 4, 2016, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Barton Gellman filed suit against DHS and other Federal agencies under the Privacy Act and FOIA, seeking disclosure of records about himself including "ticket and flight information, Passenger Name Records, records pertaining to inspections... [and] any other data collected and/or stored by ATS-P." Mr. Gellman was represented by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.<ref>{{cite web|title=Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive relief|url=https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2800097-Gellman-001.html|website=Barton Gellman v. Department of Homeland Security et al.|accessdate=12 April 2016|page=58 (Exhibit C)|date=April 4, 2016}}</ref></blockquote>
== Opposition ==
The [[American Civil Liberties Union]] had similar concerns:
<blockquote>"Never before in American history has our government gotten into the business of creating mass 'risk assessment' ratings of its own citizens," said Barry Steinhardt, Director of the ACLU's Technology and Liberty Project. "That is a radical new step with far-reaching implications – but one that has been taken almost thoughtlessly by expanding a cargo-tracking system to incorporate human beings, and with little public notice, discussion, or debate."<ref>[https://www.aclu.org/privacy/gen/27579prs20061201.html American Civil Liberties Union : ACLU Calls on DHS to Withdraw Plan For Tagging Americans With 40-Year “Risk"Risk Assessments”Assessments"<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref></blockquote>
The [[Association of Corporate Travel Executives]] (ACTE) requested an immediate suspension of the program, stating:
| 