Revision as of 01:27, 6 September 2017 edit Alsosaid1987 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,770 edits →factually incorrect ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:39, 6 September 2017 edit undo Kanguole (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 40,194 edits →factually incorrect: r Next edit →
Line 103: Please revert my correction. I have removed the factually incorrect statement for now. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Alsosaid1987\|Alsosaid1987]] ([[User talk:Alsosaid1987#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alsosaid1987\|contribs]]) 19:17, 5 September 2017 (UTC)</small> @White whirlwind: I cited a monograph title and dictionary entry, and wrote a footnote on common typographical practice. How do these constitute primary sources quote unquote original research in any way? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Alsosaid1987\|Alsosaid1987]] ([[User talk:Alsosaid1987#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alsosaid1987\|contribs]]) 02:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)</small> :Surveying usage and picking terms to look up in dictionaries are forms of original research. We need secondary sources that discuss what names were common and when. [[User talk:Kanguole\|Kanguole]] 01:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Oracle bone script: Difference between revisions