Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
CAPTAIN RAJU (talk | contribs) Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
|||
Line 15:
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font face="Bradley Hand ITC">[[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|'''CAPTAIN RAJU''']]</font><sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 11:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*'''Keep'''. [http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Frontpage.html Here is] proper entry point to the database if I understand correctly. At the first glance, it looks to me as a useful and important specialized database, and it was quoted multiple times, exactly as Peter coxhead tells above. The page is poorly written and disorganized, however this is not a valid reason for deletion. Yes, it should be fixed. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes|talk]]) 15:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
| |||