Revision as of 17:52, 29 September 2017 edit NihlusBOT (talk \| contribs) 149,040 edits →External links modified: fixing Lint errors in signatures (Task 2) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:58, 4 February 2018 edit undo נחי (talk \| contribs) 103 edits →"Constructive proof"?: new section Next edit →
Line 69: Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot\|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot\|Report bug]])</span> 14:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC) == "Constructive proof"? == The article sais "''Kellogg, Li, and Yorke turned Hirsch's proof into a constructive proof by observing that...''" <br>I'm wondering if it's indeed a constructive proof, since Brower's theorem for one dimension is equivalent to [[intermediate value theorem]], which does not admit a constructive proof. <br>See for example [https://mathoverflow.net/questions/202811/does-the-brouwer-fixed-point-theorem-admit-a-constructive-proof this discussion] in [[MathOverflow]]. [[User:נחי\|Nachi]] ([[User talk:נחי\|talk]]) 16:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Brouwer fixed-point theorem: Difference between revisions