Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 October 11: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 21:
*::But I '''am''' Aaron! --[[User:Aaron|Aaron]] 00:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''Endorse deletion''' per Guy, no compelling reason to overturn the AfD, which had a near-unanimous consensus for deletion bar one editor who argued for keeping (but gave no reasoning). It's neither necessary, reasonable nor always beneficial to inform a relevant WikiProject (of which there are a hundreds of varying degrees of utility), as depending on the WikiProject it may amount to votestacking, inadvertantly or deliberately. I would take an educated guess that telling WikiProjects on fictional universes (or fancruft if you prefer) that something is up for deletion is more likely to result in reflexive 'keep' !votes than, say, WikiProject India or WikiProject Science. --[[User:Samuel Blanning|Sam Blanning]]<sup>[[User talk:Samuel Blanning|(talk)]]</sup> 23:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
*::Whoa there, extreme bad faith. I'm apart of WP:STARGATE and I'd probably have moved for a delete too. Not only that, but several WikiProjects are created to ''decrease'' fancruft and inappropriate articles. I take extreme offense to such a suggestion. The consensus reached, whether I agree with it or not, is hardly a consensus. Have some faith in the system, that if those deletion rationales are valid they would come through in another AfD. Ignoring valid concerns and demeaning your fellow wikipedians as mindless fanboys is no attitude to have. -- [[User:Ned Scott|Ned Scott]] 01:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
====[[October 11, 2006 New York City plane crash]]====
| |||