Processing fluency: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:24, 1 December 2017

Revision as of 06:22, 4 December 2017

Line 8:

Further evidence has shown that artificial techniques can be used to trick people into believing they have encountered a stimulus previously. In one experiment,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Brown|first=Alan S.|last2=Marsh|first2=Elizabeth J.|date=2009-05-01|title=Creating Illusions of Past Encounter Through Brief Exposure|url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02337.x|journal=Psychological Science|language=en|volume=20|issue=5|pages=534–538|doi=10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02337.x}}</ref> participants were presented symbols which consisted of highly familiar symbols, less familiar symbols and novel symbols. Participants were required to report whether they had encountered any of the symbols presented before the experiment. A 35 millisecond flash preceded each symbol, in which the same, different or no symbol was flashed. It was found that the brief flash of stimulus boosted the fluency of the target item. When the same symbol was flashed, participants’ ratings of having encountered the symbol previously increased. This example illustrates that fluent processing can induce a feeling of familiarity.

Fluency and familiarity have been shown to lead to the mere exposure effect. Research has found that repetition of a stimulus can lead to fluent processing which leads to a feeling of liking.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Newell|first=Ben R.|last2=Shanks|first2=David R.|date=2007-01-01|title=Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the mere-exposure effect and recognition|url=httphttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440500487454|journal=European Journal of Cognitive Psychology|volume=19|issue=1|pages=103–118|doi=10.1080/09541440500487454|issn=0954-1446}}</ref> In this experiment, participants were presented with unfamiliar faces either three or nine times. After presentation, pairs of faces were shown to participants, each consisting of an old and new face. Results showed that participants gave higher rates of liking to the repeated faces. The mere exposure effect is eliminated if fluent processing is disrupted. Topolinski et al., (2014)<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Topolinski|first=Sascha|last2=Lindner|first2=Sandy|last3=Freudenberg|first3=Anna|date=2014-04-01|title=Popcorn in the cinema: Oral interference sabotages advertising effects|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057740813000879|journal=Journal of Consumer Psychology|series=Sensory perception, embodiment, and grounded cognition: Implications for consumer behavior|volume=24|issue=2|pages=169–176|doi=10.1016/j.jcps.2013.09.008}}</ref> explained that the fluency created by pronunciation plays a vital role in increasing fondness for a stimulus. In the experiment,<ref name=":0" /> participants were shown unfamiliar adverts in a cinema. The control group watched the adverts with a sugar cube in their mouth. Therefore, there was no interference in pronunciation in the control group. The experimental group watched the adverts whilst eating popcorn, which meant there was oral interference. One week later, participants rated their liking of products. In the control group, the mere exposure effect was observed, where old products had higher ratings than new products. In the experimental group, the mere exposure effect was abolished by interfering with fluency of pronunciation during presentation of stimulus.

Later research observed that high perceptual fluency increases the experience of [[positive affect]].<ref name=Reber1998/> Research with [[psychophysiological]] methods corroborated this positive effect on affective experience: easy-to-perceive stimuli were not only judged more positively but increased activation in the [[zygomaticus major muscle]], the so-called "smiling muscle".<ref name=Winkielman2001/> The notion that processing fluency is inherently positive led to the [[processing fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure]],<ref name=Reber2004/> and it has been used to explain people's negative reactions towards migrants, who appear to be more difficult to process than non-migrants.<ref name=Rubin2010/>

Line 16:

The truth effect can be induced by colour differences in statements as well. In a study,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Unkelbach|first=Christian|date=2007-01-01|title=Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.|url=http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xlm/33/1/219/|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition|language=English|volume=33|issue=1|pages=219–230|doi=10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219|issn=1939-1285}}</ref> participants were presented with statements, some of which were true and the rest being false. Half these statements were presented in high contrast colours and the other half were presented in low contrast colours. Independent of truth, participants judged the high contrast statements as true. Participants were also quicker to make judgements about the high contrast statements compared to the low contrast statements. The contrast differences in statements increased fluency.

Fluency has been shown to affect judgements of humour. In one study,<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Topolinski|first=Sascha|date=2014-07-04|title=A processing fluency-account of funniness: Running gags and spoiling punchlines|url=httphttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.863180|journal=Cognition and Emotion|volume=28|issue=5|pages=811–820|doi=10.1080/02699931.2013.863180|issn=0269-9931|pmid=24320137}}</ref> participants were presented with jokes which were in easy to read or hard to read fonts. Participants were asked to rate which jokes they believed were more humorous. Participants gave higher ratings to jokes in easy to read fonts. It has been predicted that the jokes in easy to read fonts feel fluent, as they are easier to pronounce and this results in higher ratings.<ref name=":1" /> The fluent processing has been misattributed to the humour of the statement.

As high processing fluency indicates that the interaction of a person with the environment goes smoothly,<ref name="Winkielman2003"/> a person does not need to pay particular attention to the environment. By contrast, low processing fluency means that there are problems in the interaction with the environment which requires more attention and an analytical processing style to solve the problem. Indeed, people process information more shallowly when processing fluency is high and employ an analytical thinking style when processing fluency is low.<ref name=Alter2007/><ref name=Song2008/>

Line 37:

<ref name=Alter2006>{{cite journal|last=Alter |first=A.L. |last2=Oppenheimer |first2=D.M. |title=Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=103 |issue=24 |pages=9369–9372 |date=2006 |url=http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~aalter/PNAS.pdf|doi=10.1073/pnas.0601071103 |pmid=16754871 |pmc=1482615}} {{open access}}</ref>

<ref name=Alter2007>{{cite journal|doi=10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569|title=Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: General|volume=136|issue=4|pages=569–576|year=2007|last1=Alter|first1=Adam L.|last2=Oppenheimer|first2=Daniel M.|last3=Epley|first3=Nicholas|last4=Eyre|first4=Rebecca N. |url=httphttps://waybackweb.archive.org/web/20160602061812/http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~aalter/intuitive.pdf}}

</ref>

<ref name=Alter2009>{{cite journal |url=httphttps://waybackweb.archive.org/web/20160426075912/http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~aalter/tribes.pdf |doi=10.1177/1088868309341564|pmid=19638628|title=Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation |journal=Personality and Social Psychology Review|volume=13|issue=3|pages=219–235|year=2009|last1=Alter|first1=A. L.|last2=Oppenheimer|first2=D. M.}}</ref>

<ref name=Bennett2010>{{cite news |title=Easy=True: How "cognitive fluency" shapes what we believe, how we invest, and who will become a supermodel |url=httphttps://waybackweb.archive.org/web/20160613150559/http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/01/31/easy__true/?page=full |publisher=The Boston Globe |first=Drake |last=Bennett |date=January 31, 2010}}</ref>

<ref name=Greifeneder2010>{{cite journal|doi=10.1177/1948550610368434|title=On Writing Legibly: Processing Fluency Systematically Biases Evaluations of Handwritten Material|journal=Social Psychological and Personality Science|volume=1|issue=3|pages=230–237|year=2010|last1=Greifeneder|first1=R.|last2=Alt|first2=A.|last3=Bottenberg|first3=K.|last4=Seele|first4=T.|last5=Zelt|first5=S.|last6=Wagener|first6=D.}}</ref>

Line 60:

<ref name=Reber2008>{{cite journal|doi=10.3758/PBR.15.6.1174|title=The use of heuristics in intuitive mathematical judgment|journal=Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|volume=15|issue=6|pages=1174–1178|year=2008|last1=Reber|first1=Rolf|last2=Brun|first2=Morten|last3=Mitterndorfer|first3=Karoline}}</ref>

<ref name=Rubin2010>{{cite journal|doi=10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.006|title=A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants|journal=Journal of Experimental Social Psychology|volume=46|pages=21–28|year=2010|last1=Rubin|first1=Mark|last2=Paolini|first2=Stefania|last3=Crisp|first3=Richard J. |url=httphttps://waybackweb.archive.org/web/20160613123646/http://www.media-diversity.org/en/additional-files/documents/b-studies-reports/A_processing_fluency_explanation_of_bias_against_migrants.pdf}}</ref>

<ref name=Rugg2007>{{cite journal|doi=10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004|pmid=17481940|title=Event-related potentials and recognition memory|journal=Trends in Cognitive Sciences|volume=11|issue=6|pages=251–257|year=2007|last1=Rugg|first1=Michael D.|last2=Curran|first2=Tim}}</ref>

Line 68:

<ref name=Song2008>{{cite journal|doi=10.1521/soco.2008.26.6.791|title=Fluency and the Detection of Misleading Questions: Low Processing Fluency Attenuates the Moses Illusion|journal=Social Cognition|volume=26|issue=6|pages=791–799|year=2008|last1=Song|first1=Hyunjin|last2=Schwarz|first2=Norbert}}</ref>

<ref name=Topolinski2009>{{cite journal|doi=10.1037/a0014678|title=The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: General|volume=138|issue=1|pages=39–63|year=2009|last1=Topolinski|first1=Sascha|last2=Strack|first2=Fritz |url=httphttps://waybackweb.archive.org/web/20160613102611/http://soco.uni-koeln.de/files/Topolinski_Strack_2009_JEPG_architecture_of_intuition.pdf}}</ref>

<ref name=Topolinski2010>{{cite journal|doi=10.1177/0963721410388803|title=Gaining Insight into the "Aha" Experience|journal=Current Directions in Psychological Science|volume=19|issue=6|pages=402–405|year=2010|last1=Topolinski|first1=S.|last2=Reber|first2=R.|ref=harv |url=httphttps://waybackweb.archive.org/web/20160613103031/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rolf_Reber/publication/258127962_Gaining_Insight_Into_the_Aha_Experience/links/547f4f730cf2ccc7f8b91e33.pdf}}</ref>

<ref name=Waldman2014>{{Cite news|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/09/truthiness_research_cognitive_biases_for_simple_clear_conservative_messages.html|title=The Science of Truthiness|last=Waldman|first=Katy|date=2014-09-03|newspaper=Slate|language=en-US|issn=1091-2339|access-date=2016-10-03}}</ref>

Line 78:

<ref name=Winkielman2001>{{cite journal|doi=10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989|pmid=11761320|title=Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect|journal=Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|volume=81|issue=6|pages=989–1000|year=2001|last1=Winkielman|first1=Piotr|last2=Cacioppo|first2=John T.}}</ref>

<ref name="Winkielman2003">{{cite book|editor1-last=Musch|editor1-first=Jochen|editor2-last=Klauer|editor2-first=Karl C.|title=The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion|date=2003|publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers|___location=Mahwah, NJ|isbn=9781135640590|pages=189–217|url=https://books.google.com/?id=t1h6AgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA195&pg=PA195|language=en|chapter=The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment|last1=Winkielman|first1=P.|last2=Schwarz|first2=N.|last3=Reber|first3=R.|last4=Fazendeiro|first4=T. |chapter-url=httphttps://waybackweb.archive.org/web/20160227144950/http://dornsife.usc.edu/assets/sites/780/docs/winkielman_et_al_fluency_hedonic_pri.pdf}}</ref>

<ref name="Wray2011">{{cite news|last1=Wray|first1=H.|title=Aha! The 23-Across Phenomenon|work=APS Observer|publisher=Association for Psychological Science|url=httphttps://waybackweb.archive.org/web/20160304043438/http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2011/january-11/aha-the-23-across-phenomenon.html|volume=24|issue=1|date=January 2011}}</ref>

}}

==Further reading==

*{{cite book|last1=Winkielman|first1=P.|last2=Huber|first2=D.E.|last3=Kavanagh|first3=L.|last4=Schwarz|first4=N.|chapter=Fluency of consistency: When thoughts fit nicely and flow smoothly|editor1-last=Gawronski|editor1-first=Bertram|editor2-last=Strack|editor2-first=Fritz|title=Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition|publisher=Guilford Press|isbn= 9781609189464|date=2012|pages=89–111|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gfMytVxgOM0C&pg=PA89|language=en |chapter-url=httphttps://waybackweb.archive.org/web/20160618094227/http://people.umass.edu/dehuber/winkielman_huber_kavanagh_schwarz.pdf}}

[[Category:Aesthetics]]