Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:54, 4 December 2004

Revision as of 20:19, 5 December 2004

Line 367:

Hi. Over the past year , I've had some personal experience with the workings of the Arbitration committee in the case of Mr Natural Health and Irismeister. On the whole I was happy with the outcomes. The judgements seem pretty fair (Perhaps a bit soft IMO but then I am biased) What I was not happy with, was the speed at which those judgements took place. I see this as a major failing . Taking months to reach a decision is not acceptable, and if I were elected my main effort would be in finding a way to speed up the process.

I'm very active on wikipedia. I edit nearly every day. I don?'t believe the wiki is being overrun by POV pushers, edit warriors or trolls, but I do feel the few we have need to be told in no uncertain terms that bad behaviour is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

I'm not going to go on about how I'll be neutral, fair, and even handed. If you know me you can judge for yourself. If you don't know me, you should look over my edit history. Actions speak louder than words. Do feel free to ask me any questions you like on my talk page. [[User:Theresa knott|Theresa Knott]] [[User talk:Theresa knott| (Tart, knees hot)]] 22:22, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

== [[User:VeryVerily|VeryVerily]] ==