Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data-constrained modelling: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
XOR'easter (talk | contribs) |
XOR'easter (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9:
The term "data-constrained modelling" has a high hit rate in Google keyword search, and has been published by a range of rigorously peer-reviewed journals and other publications. These are indications of the community acceptance. It would serve as a helpful reference if the term is included in Wikipedia <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Yangys au|Yangys au]] ([[User talk:Yangys au#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yangys au|contribs]]) 08:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{article creator|Yangys au}} <small>— [[User:Yangys au|Yangys au]] ([[User talk:Yangys au|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yangys au|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
*'''Delete''' As written, it's vanispamcruftisement for a topic that is far, far more narrow than the title would suggest (''most'' scientific models are constrained by data in ''some'' way!). The most highly-cited paper on the topic that I can find ([https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/4/047001]) has only 43 GS citations, which is well below any reasonable standard of notability (recalling that GS casts a pretty wide net for what counts as "published"). [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 19:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
| |||