Revision as of 00:02, 5 February 2018 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Page movers 2,449,142 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Brouwer fixed-point theorem/Archive 1) (bot ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:59, 24 February 2019 edit undo Finnusertop (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 90,338 edits →Citation style: new section Next edit →
Line 64: ::Thank you for the answer. It makes it clear. ::Unless I completely not aware of the usual use of "constructive" in mathematics, I guess the best way to describe KLY version of Hirsch's proof is simply write "numerical algorithm" or "computable method", instead of "constructive". Also in the description of Scarf's proof the word "construct" should be replaced by "calculate". [[User:נחי\|Nachi]] ([[User talk:נחי\|talk]]) 20:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC) == Citation style == This article mixes parenthetical referencing with footnoted references. The parenthetical ones were there first, so according to [[WP:CITEVAR]] we'd have to use that until explicit consensus. However, it would be significantly easier to turn the couple of parenthetical ones into footnotes than about 50 footnotes into parentheticals. Can we form consensus to continued using footnoted references? <span style="font-family: serif; letter-spacing: 0.1em">– [[User:Finnusertop\|Finnusertop]]</span> ([[User talk:Finnusertop\|talk]] ⋅ [[Special:Contributions/Finnusertop\|contribs]]) 19:59, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Brouwer fixed-point theorem: Difference between revisions