Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elm (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:42, 18 February 2018

Revision as of 21:48, 18 February 2018

Line 7:

:({{Find sources AFD|Elm (programming language)}})

There are no secondary sources as references; the reference list consists only of links to Elm documentation, with the exception of two which are the Redux.js documentation and Vue.js documentation. Doing a google on Elm did not bring about any notable references. Even though the language has a passing mention in Sitepoint which is not a reputable reference nothing suggests that this is any more notable than, say, [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PureScript_(programming_language)|PureScript]]. The language is reasonably popular, but popularity isn't the same thing as nontrivial coverage in several reliable sources, which Wikipedia requires. [[User:Chris-martin|Chris-martin]] ([[User talk:Chris-martin|talk]]) 17:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

*'''Keep'''. There's [https://books.google.com/books?id=d5_8MAAACAAJ this] upcoming book, and Czaplicki's dissertation has been cited [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=3885079718013853814&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en a bit]. The most relevant citations look like [http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A954012&dswid=-29] and [https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3064907] and [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christopher_Anand/publication/317267853_Using_Elm_to_Introduce_Algebraic_Thinking_to_K-8_Students/links/592f2ae1aca272fc55d7c586/Using-Elm-to-Introduce-Algebraic-Thinking-to-K-8-Students.pdf]. Finally, I think [https://books.google.com/books?id=NWcNDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA167] and [https://books.google.com/books?id=lc-foAEACAAJ] decisively establishesestablish significant coverage in a reliable sourcesources. [[User:Υπογράφω|Υπογράφω]] ([[User talk:Υπογράφω|talk]]) 21:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)