Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Riedacker: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:13, 20 February 2018

Revision as of 01:42, 20 February 2018

Line 15:

*'''Delete'''. Any claim to a share of the [[2007 Nobel Peace Prize]] is spurious. According to the award citation, IPCC received the prize for the totality of its efforts over several decades: "Through the scientific reports it has issued over the past two decades, the IPCC has created an ever-broader informed consensus about the connection between human activities and global warming. Thousands of scientists and officials from over one hundred countries have collaborated to achieve greater certainty as to the scale of the warming". Moreover, in science, having reviewed/refereed an important article does not entitle you to a credit for that article. GScholar citations appear to be fairly low, even for a field like agronomy, with h-index around 7, and the top-cited article having only 30 citations. I am not seeing anything else here to justify passing [[WP:PROF]] on any other grounds. [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 13:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

*'''Speedy Keep''' He is notable Scientist and academician. His contribution in literature is also remarkable. He is writer and public speaker, motivating young generation and he is guiding torch in his specialised area.[[Special:Contributions/2405:205:312F:5E4C:67D9:6CEF:709A:D3C3|2405:205:312F:5E4C:67D9:6CEF:709A:D3C3]] ([[User talk:2405:205:312F:5E4C:67D9:6CEF:709A:D3C3|talk]]) 01:13, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

**Please see [[WP:PROF]] for the notability requirements for Wikipedia articles about academics. You need to provide specific verifiable evidence of the subject satisfying some criterion/criteria of [[WP:PROF]]. Your personal expressions of appreciation don't count. [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 01:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC)