Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of sexual slurs: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 8:
**As above, could I ask you to provide a rational for why this is encyclopedic? It was transwikied a few days ago. I realize there wasn't found to have been consensus a last time around, but one of the principles of AfD and deletion in general is that it is inconsistent. It's inevitable. Can you give a ''reason'' for why there shouldn't be such consensus now? [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk:Dmcdevit|t]] 05:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' From [[WP:NOT]]: ''"Wikipedia is not a dictionary or a usage or jargon guide. Wikipedia articles are not...[l]ists of such definitions...usage guide[s] or slang and idiom guide[s]"''. [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NPOV]] are irrelevant, since they refer to encyclopedia articles. This is a list of dictionary defintions. [[Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines#Key_policies|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]], [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary|not a dictionary]]. -- [[User:IslaySolomon|<font color="#153E7E">I</font><font color="#1569C7">sl</font><font color="#157DEC">a</font><font color="#1589FF">y</font><font color="#1589FF">So</font><font color="#157DEC">lo</font><font color="#1569C7">mo</font><font color="#153E7E">n</font>]] <font color="#153E7E">|</font> [[User talk:IslaySolomon|<font color="#006600">t</font><font color="#336633">a</font><font color="#669966">l</font><font color="#99CC99">k</font>]] 04:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Not a slang, jargopn or usage guide, plus this is a gathering place for the trivial, uncited, sophomoric and ridiculous. [[WP:CCC|Consensus can change]]. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> 08:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)