Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requests for comment Slrubenstein: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:14, 10 December 2004

Revision as of 00:24, 11 December 2004

Line 25:

*<s>'''Question''' - There is a clear conflict here between the explicit policy to delete, and the apparent (near) concensus to keep. I'm not familiar with the case, so please forgive my ignorance when I ask the obvious: "what is the value in keeping this despite the standard?" -- [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User talk:ClockworkSoul|'''Soul''']] 21:56, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)</s>

** Nevermind - I made myself somewhat familiar with the case. On one hand, we have policy that specifies that such RfCs be deleted. On the other, there is some cause to keep these records (at the very minimum, as evidence in another case). Whatever your/our feelings about ''any'' user, whatever that user has done, it is wrong to ignore the policies that are in place so that we can maintain some level of order. Surely, nobody here would want any policies selectively applied to them? That being said: '''I propose that we temporarily delist these items from VfD, and open a vote to amend the current policy so that ''all'' such RfC's are archived regardless of their outcome.''' -- [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User talk:ClockworkSoul|'''Soul''']] 22:14, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

*Good point about policy. I volunteer to tak all of these RfCs into my user namespace. [[User:Cool Hand Luke|Cool Hand]] [[User talk:Cool Hand Luke|<font color="purple">Luke</font>]] 00:24, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)