Talk:Exploit (computer security): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 44:
* '''Oppose''' Per [[WP:PTOPIC]]: "no single criterion for defining a primary topic, two major aspects that are commonly considered are [usage] and [long-term significance]"..."''consensus'' may be useful in determining which topic, if any, is the primary topic." My input is it remain how it is, the term "exploit" has been used to describe labor and resources far longer than video games and computers. Also note PTOPIC's mention of [[Apple]] vs Apple Inc. Internet clicks is irrelevant, it doesn't give the whole picture. Having the disambiguation as the primary is a fair compromise already. [[User:DA1|DA1]] ([[User talk:DA1|talk]]) 17:09, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
**You are talking about the word "exploitation". "Exploit" on its own is not used to describe labor and resources, hence why it's called "labor exploitation" and not "labor exploits". There is a difference, which is why this should point to the subject that uses "Exploit". A hatnote can clear up any confusion.<sub><small>[[User:Zxcvbnm|ZXCVBNM]] ([[User Talk:Zxcvbnm|TALK]])</small></sub> 20:25, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' exploit is a common noun, and verb. This obscure computer security use would be [[WP:ASTONISH]]ing. So far from a [[WP:PT]] surprised to see an RM [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 08:36, 26 March 2018 (UTC)