Revision as of 14:40, 16 November 2004 edit Doradus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 6,033 edits →Silly section: This article needs a cleanup ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:24, 11 December 2004 edit undo Wlievens (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,559 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 18: :Really, this article needs a serious cleanup. The trouble is, I have found that computer science articles don't stay cleaned up for long. Well-meaning CS people come along and add in their opinions, seemingly unaware that they are not objective facts. That's why I have turned my attention more towards science and astronomy articles lately. :-) --[[User:P3d0\|P3d0]] 14:40, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC) == Pure OO == In the section where it is claimed that Eiffel is pure OO, it introduces control structures that are not in any way object oriented. I'm not a purist or formalist, but if you claim a language to be pure OO, "special form" control structures like loops and ifs should be replaced by message sends (like in Smalltalk). This page really is a sales ad!

Talk:Eiffel (programming language): Difference between revisions