Revision as of 20:31, 30 March 2018 edit Redrose64 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 278,984 edits →New York mountain and hill stubs: tentative sup ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:54, 30 March 2018 edit undo Pegship (talk \| contribs) Administrators 142,688 edits →New York mountain and hill stubs: counterproposal Next edit →
Line 18: '''Support''' - We don't seem to have a stub type for landforms other than rivers, and I have reun into areas where a -mountain- type would be extremely useful. Don't know if hills should be part of the name, but I bow to more experienced stubbers than myself on that. [[User:Pegship\|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship\|talk]]) 17:44, 30 March 2018 (UTC) It puzzles me why we don't seem to have stub templates/categories for mountains. Have all the mountain articles been developed well beyond the stub level? Presumably not: so can we start with a general {{tlx\|mountain-stub}} and only go to a more local level when we need to? It's normal to go top-down with stubs, rather than bottom-up. --[[User:Redrose64\|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] 🌹 ([[User talk:Redrose64\|talk]]) 20:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC) *'''Modified proposal''' Could we start with continent-level mountain stubs? [[User:Pegship\|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship\|talk]]) 22:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC) ===Khyber Pakhtunkhwa geography stubs sub-cats part deux===

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2018/March: Difference between revisions