Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requests for comment Slrubenstein: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 28:
** Nevermind - I made myself somewhat familiar with the case. On one hand, we have policy that specifies that such RfCs be deleted. On the other, there is some cause to keep these records (at the very minimum, as evidence in another case). Whatever your/our feelings about ''any'' user, whatever that user has done, it is wrong to ignore the policies that are in place so that we can maintain some level of order. Surely, nobody here would want any policies selectively applied to them? That being said: '''I propose that we temporarily delist these items from VfD, and open a vote to amend the current policy so that ''all'' such RfC's are archived regardless of their outcome.''' -- [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User talk:ClockworkSoul|'''Soul''']] 22:14, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*Good point about policy. I volunteer to tak all of these RfCs into my user namespace. [[User:Cool Hand Luke|Cool Hand]] [[User talk:Cool Hand Luke|<font color="purple">Luke</font>]] 00:24, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
* Keep. IMO VfD is not the place for this discussion, but best now to just let this vote proceed and (hopefully) fail. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] 16:23, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
| |||