Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAM Development: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→PAM Development: resp |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12:
*:The company was independent for 10 of its 13 years of lifetime, yet we have just about no information on it. The one-liner on the 2K Sports is not quite enough to justify a redirect, as the reader will find out practically nothing if they were sent there. [[User:Lordtobi|<span style="font-family: Impact;">Lordtobi</span>]] ([[User talk:Lordtobi|<span style="color: #B0B0B0;">✉</span>]]) 10:50, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
*::Well, they will learn that the company was later part of 2K Sports. If we delete the article without a redirect, they won't even learn that. So how is the latter preferable? Regards [[User:SoWhy|<b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b>]] 11:07, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Their products were notable to have their own pages and one was licensed from a major (if poor) film and the other licensed a highly popular football player, the company will have more than enough sources out there to sustain an article.[[Special:Contributions/217.43.203.61|217.43.203.61]] ([[User talk:217.43.203.61|talk]]) 19:00, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
| |||