Revision as of 23:12, 2 May 2018 edit Sir Tony Britton (talk \| contribs) 365 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:53, 3 May 2018 edit undo Guy Harris (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 80,041 edits →Limitations: That's because they had the same architecture; it's not as if there was something special about the 155 and 165. Next edit →
Line 57: "neither offered virtual storage capability, which was to be a hallmark of the 370 line."<ref name="what-course-for-the-3081">{{cite newspaper\|newspaper=Computerworld\|date=November 24, 1980\|page=34\|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cKmJJd7R8PIC&pg=PA34#v=onepage&q&f=false\|title=What Course for the 3081?}}</ref> The 370/155 was described as able to "run under [[DOS/360 and successors\|DOS]]." Both the 155 and the larger 370/165 could "run under [[OS/360 and successors\|OS/360]]." ~~The~~Being ~~Model~~members ~~155 was compatible with~~of the System/370 family, the Model 155 and Model 165 were compatible with each other. Neither machine, as announced, could run a virtual memory operating system. ==Growth path==

IBM System/370 Model 155: Difference between revisions