Content deleted Content added
Visionhelp (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 67:
So, there is still a gap with GPT, practically, because of good-practice Alignment (typically 1MB) and this gap may be used with fitting or encompassing Partition or without. But without, it may be even less reliable und undefined as the 63-block MBR-gap. Furthermore with GPT it is not to bold to claim a partition, where in MBR this would have cost 1 of only 4 primary partitions. Just saying/thinking. --[[User:Itu|Itu]] ([[User talk:Itu|talk]]) 10:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
== SSD-Drive with GPT, not accessable by XP, by BIOS I don not know ==
My starting point is knowing only [[Master_boot_record|MBR]]. But without a knowing what is a good workable with superordinate, genus. <br>
Until know meeting GPT (on SSD-Drive) there for me was no necessity to it. <br>
The point: XP and/or BIOS (?, sorry) did not recognize it. <br>
To be able to make it accessable I had to work out, what is it, GPT, and how to get to MBR. <br>
Only [http://www.diskpart.com www.diskpart.com] I could find, with software, to change from GPT to MBR. <br>
Some days after these hourful works I could get an other, much more easyer (instead to have to figure all this out until understanding what has to be done and how and with what (software)) way to do it: [[xfdisk]]. <br>
(An unknown drive is shown, this ´partition´ delete and create a partition again just does it, as told to me by a professionell.) <br>
To let it others know, I just do note it now here. But I cannot do the efforts to look for sources to it now, sorry. But in hope, my works and figuring outs, already may be a help. <br>
Thanks the interesst. <br>
--[[User:Visionhelp|Visionhelp]] ([[User talk:Visionhelp|talk]]) 11:27, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
| |||