Module talk:Sports table/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Module talk:Sports table) (bot
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Module talk:Sports table) (bot
Line 2,051:
::: still working on it, see [[User:Frietjes/chess]] for what I have so far. when I am finished, the matches will be formatted and the WDL will be automatically computed from the match data. [[User:Frietjes|Frietjes]] ([[User talk:Frietjes|talk]]) 16:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
::::I really, really appreciate that effort. But I don't want it to be in vain: you don't just need to please me, you need to please other editors at [[Candidates Tournament 2018#Standings]]. I think it's better to have the tie break columns more flexible. I mentioned in my first post that there is actually a 3rd tie break score, so we'd want a 3rd tie break column. Also if it's flexible, that allows it to be used in other tournaments which might have a different tie break method. That's why I think all I need - and perhaps what is best - is the ability to add extra columns and put whatever we want there. Also problematic would be the "+" signs in that table and the disappearance of the colours, though I'm guessing that's because you're still debugging. [[User:Adpete|Adpete]] ([[User talk:Adpete|talk]]) 22:44, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 
==Colours in use==
See discussion at [[Talk:Candidates Tournament 2018#Advance to title match]]. [[Special:Contributions/91.124.117.29|91.124.117.29]] ([[User talk:91.124.117.29|talk]]) 20:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
* I have found [[Module_talk:Sports_table/Archive_1#Confusion_due_to_use_of_colour|this discussion]] for very good proposition about "confusion" due to use of colour. Any thoughts? [[Special:Contributions/91.124.117.29|91.124.117.29]] ([[User talk:91.124.117.29|talk]]) 20:42, 26 March 2018 (UTC)