Talk:Elm (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Everrob (talk | contribs)
Example code section unnecessary: Just starting a conversation about which parts are or aren't "unnecessary"
Line 21:
 
I think some of it should be kept, like the "Hello World"; that seems typical of articles about programming languages. It would be nice if the rest was sectioned or re-labelled if the goal was to demonstrate "Syntax" or particular features. Mostly, though, I just wanted to point out that https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Elm_programming_language could be a place for material cut from here. --[[User:Everrob|Everrob]] ([[User talk:Everrob|talk]]) 20:56, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 
== More Diverse sources ==
 
Most of the sources link back to official Elm documentation. Are there any other alternative sources that can be cited so that all references aren't dependent on the same team as makes the language?