Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tae Jitsu: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Tae Jitsu]]: delete |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19:
*'''Comment''' I think [[User:MasterGreenLantern]] really feels strongly about this so I propose we hold off for a week to give him a chance to address the concerns in the article rather than here and elsewhere. The article itself (not the links) has to make the case for notability, it does not. I suggest using [[Hakko Ryu]] as an example of a minimal article. Who founded the art, when was it founded, where is it practiced, who's in charge? Of course if it is expaned beyond that great. I put a few tags into the article itself.[[User:PRehse|Peter Rehse]] 09:59, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Unless the article in significantly expanded (e.g. origins, how it's different) it dose not provide any useful info.
*I'm trying to do some research and gather information right now. I'll see if I can expand the article in a few days. I honestly know almost nothing about Tae Jitsu (personally, my favorite martial arts are Jeet Kune Do and Systema, and I don't know much about martial arts beyond those two). But I'll see what I can do about expanding the article (unless someone more knowledgeable shows up). [[User:MasterGreenLantern|MasterGreenLantern]] 22:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
| |||