Scientific method: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Characterization: not "ignored", merely nonexistent
Characterization: The difference between mass and weight becomes obvious for space travelers.
Line 32:
The scientific method depends upon the careful characterization of the subject of the investigation.
 
[[Observation]] demands careful ''[[measurement]]'' and the use of ''[[operational definition]]s'' of relevant concepts. When the terms used are formally defining, they acquire exact meanings which do not necessarily correspond with their use in [[natural language]]: for example, ''[[mass]]'' and ''[[weight]]'' are quite distinct concepts,. butBut therethe distinction is no such distinctionmoot in in many applications in whichour theseeveryday wordslife. areFor usedthose inwho ourlive everydayonly life,on suchthe assurface of the sale[[earth]] ofand goodsare bynot weight.in orbit (Precisearound meaningsit, arethere alsomay importantnot innot thatbe field,an andobvious usingdistinction the(except physicsperhaps jargonfor meaningthose ofwho "weight"study in[[gravitation]] connectionand withlike commercefields isin incorrect.[[physics]]).
 
New theories may arise when it is realised that words used have not previously been clearly defined. For example, [[Albert Einstein|Albert Einstein's]] first paper on [[relativity]] begins by defining [[simultaneity]] and the means for determining [[length]] (which were skipped over by [[Isaac Newton]] with "I do not define [[time]], space, place and [[motion]], as being well known to all") and proceeds to demonstrate that, given these definitions, certain widely accepted ideas (absolute time; length independent of motion) were invalid.