Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 4: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Category:Vaccine controversies: Support |
Marcocapelle (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 31:
*'''Oppose nom''' -- '''Rename''' [[:Category:Vaccination controversies]]. The most obvious case is MMR, which was the result of bad science getting past the academic refereeing process (where it should have been stopped), with the result that what should have been fake news received publicity that it did not deserve. However that happened, so that we have to have articles (and a category). It is certainly true that occasionally vaccines produce an adverse reaction, but non-vaccination also carries a risk, that of getting the disease and suffering disabling complications. For a vaccination programme to be effective, a large proportion of the population needs to be immunised. Where they are not, there is a severe risk of an epidemic. [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 14:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
*'''Support/Correct Venue''' The oppose votes above indicate that the article is misnamed. OK, submit a requested move on [[Vaccine hesitancy]] and reach a consensus for a better name. I'll gladly support renaming this category to match the outcome (whether I agree with it or not). Having different main article and category names hinders navigation. [[User:RevelationDirect|RevelationDirect]] ([[User talk:RevelationDirect|talk]]) 03:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
* I do not have a clear opinion about this but I note that a few opposers are actually opposing the rename of the article. {{ping|JzG}} it might be helpful if you could give a link to the discussion about the article rename so that perhaps we get a better understanding of the article name change. [[User:Marcocapelle|Marcocapelle]] ([[User talk:Marcocapelle|talk]]) 18:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
==== Category:Biodiversity hotspots ====
| |||