Content deleted Content added
m →Requested move 14 February 2019: Restored Requested move layout |
→Survey: Reply |
||
Line 176:
*'''Support SDRAM only''' per concise, common name, oppose others per precise, etc. [[User:Red Slash|<span style="color:#FF4131;">Red</span>]] [[User talk:Red Slash|<b><span style="color:#460121;">Slash</span></b>]] 02:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
*'''Oppose all'''. For ''xDDRx SDRAM'' moves per arguments above. For SDRAM the existing page name and redirect are well adequate, and other acronyms for SDRAM might appear in twenty years time, so I see no need to move it, though my opposition for the latter case is not as strong.[[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 11:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
::{{Reply|Djm-leighpark}} {{WPcrystalball}} ~ [[User:Arkhandar|<b style="color: #8cc5ff;">''Arkhandar''</b>]] <sup>([[User talk:Arkhandar|<b style="color: #b3b3b3;">''message me''</b>]])</sup> 20:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
*'''Oppose all''' - I see no improvement at all and the DDR/GDDR moves are complete nonsense. --[[User:Denniss|Denniss]] ([[User talk:Denniss|talk]]) 11:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
| |||