Open-loop controller: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:50, 23 March 2019

Revision as of 13:06, 1 September 2019

Line 4:

In an '''open-loop controller''', also called a '''non-feedback controller''', the control action from the controller is independent of the "process output", which is the process variable that is being controlled.<ref name="auto">"Feedback and control systems" - JJ Di Steffano, AR Stubberud, IJ Williams. Schaums outline series, McGraw-Hill 1967</ref> It does not use [[feedback]] to determine if its output has achieved the desired goal of the input command or process "set point".

There are a large number ofmany open -loop controls, such as on/off switching of valves, machinery, lights, motors or heaters, where the control result is known to be approximately sufficient under normal conditions without the need for feedback. The advantage of using open -loop control in these cases is the reduction in component count and complexity. However, an open-loop system cannot correct any errors that it makes or correct for outside disturbances, and cannot engage in [[machine learning]].

==Open-loop and closed-loop (feedback) control==

[[File:Electromechanicaltimer.JPG|thumb|right|An electromechanical timer, normally used for open-loop control based purely on a timing sequence, with no feedback from the process.]]

Fundamentally, there are two types of control loop: open -loop (feedforward) control, and closed loop (feedback) control.

In open -loop control, the control action from the controller is independent of the "process output" (or "controlled process variable"). A good example of this is a central heating boiler controlled only by a timer, so that heat is applied for a constant time, regardless of the temperature of the building. The control action is the switching on/off of the boiler, but the controlled variable should be the building temperature, but is not as this is open-loop control of the boiler, which does not give closed-loop control of the temperature.

In closed loop control, the control action from the controller is dependent on the process output. In the case of the boiler analogy this would include a thermostat to monitor the building temperature, and thereby feed back a signal to ensure the controller maintains the building at the temperature set on the thermostat. A closed loop controller therefore has a feedback loop which ensures the controller exerts a control action to give a process output the same as the "reference input" or "set point". For this reason, closed loop controllers are also called feedback controllers.<ref name="auto"/>

Line 19:

== Applications ==

[[File:Electric Clothes dryer.jpg|thumb|Electric clothes dryer, which is open -loop controlled by running the dryer for a set time, regardless of clothes dryness.]]

An open-loop controller is often used in simple processes because of its simplicity and low cost, especially in systems where feedback is not critical. A typical example would be an older model domestic [[clothes dryer]], for which the length of time is entirely dependent on the judgement of the human operator, with no automatic feedback of the dryness of the clothes.

For example, an [[irrigation sprinkler]] system, programmed to turn on at set times could be an example of an open-loop system if it does not measure [[soil]] [[moisture]] as a form of feedback. Even if rain is pouring down on the lawn, the sprinkler system would activate on schedule, wasting water.

Another example is a [[Stepper motor]]s used for control of position. Sending it a stream of electrical pulses causes it to rotate by exactly that many steps, hence the name. If the motor was always assumed to perform each movement correctly, without positional feedback, it would be open -loop control. However, if there is a position encoder, or sensors to indicate the "start" or finish positions, then that is closed-loop control, such as in many [[inkjet printer]]s. The drawback of open-loop control of steppers is that if the machine load is too high, or the motor attempts to move too quickly, then steps may be skipped. The controller has no means of detecting this and so the machine continues to run slightly out of adjustment until reset. For this reason, more complex robots and machine tools instead use [[servomotor]]s rather than stepper motors, which incorporate [[rotary encoder|encoder]]s and [[closed-loop controller]]s.

However, open-loop control is very useful and economic for well-defined systems where the relationship between input and the resultant state can be reliably modeled by a mathematical formula. For example, determining the [[voltage]] to be fed to an [[electric motor]] that drives a constant load, in order to achieve a desired [[speed]] would be a good application. But if the load were not predictable and became excessive, the motor's speed might vary as a function of the load not just the voltage, and an open-loop controller would be insufficient to ensure repeatable control of the velocity.

Line 30:

An example of this is a conveyor system that is required to travel at a constant speed. For a constant voltage, the conveyor will move at a different speed depending on the load on the motor (represented here by the weight of objects on the conveyor). In order for the conveyor to run at a constant speed, the voltage of the motor must be adjusted depending on the load. In this case, a closed-loop control system would be necessary.

Thus there are a large number ofmany open -loop controls, such as switching valves, lights, motors or heaters on and off, where the result is known to be approximately sufficient without the need for feedback.

==Feedback control==

A feed back control system, such as a [[PID controller]], can be improved by combining the [[feedback]] (or closed-loop) control of a PID controller with [[feed forward (control)|feed-forward]] (or open-loop) control. Knowledge about the system (such as the desired acceleration and inertia) can be fed forward and combined with the PID output to improve the overall system performance. The feed-forward value alone can often provide the major portion of the controller output. The PID controller primarily has to compensate whatever difference or ''error'' remains between the setpoint (SP) and the system response to the open -loop control. Since the feed-forward output is not affected by the process feedback, it can never cause the control system to oscillate, thus improving the system response without affecting stability. Feed forward can be based on the setpoint and on extra measured disturbances. Setpoint weighting is a simple form of feed forward.

For example, in most motion control systems, in order to accelerate a mechanical load under control, more force is required from the actuator. If a velocity loop PID controller is being used to control the speed of the load and command the force being applied by the actuator, then it is beneficial to take the desired instantaneous acceleration, scale that value appropriately and add it to the output of the PID velocity loop controller. This means that whenever the load is being accelerated or decelerated, a proportional amount of force is commanded from the actuator regardless of the feedback value. The PID loop in this situation uses the feedback information to change the combined output to reduce the remaining difference between the process setpoint and the feedback value. Working together, the combined open-loop feed-forward controller and closed-loop PID controller can provide a more responsive control system in some situations.