Post open source: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Silklane (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Add explation of the modern Post Open, not just the old and unsuccessful rejection of licenses.
Line 2:
{{Notability|date=October 2013}}
 
Post Open (for Post Open Source) is a proposed successor to the [[Open source|Open Source]] software paradigm orginated by [[Bruce Perens]], the creator of the [[Open Source Definition]] and co-founder of the [[Open Source Initiative]]. It is promoted at the web site [https://PostOpen.org/ PostOpen.org]

'''Post open source''', also called "post open-source software (POSS)", iswas a 2012/2013 noticed movement<ref>[https://opensource.com/business/14/8/interview-michael-tiemann-red-hat How to think like open source pioneer] by Michael Tiemann (5 Aug 2014)</ref><ref name="infoworld" /> among [[software developer]]s, in particular [[open-source software]] developers. The interpretation was that this was a reaction to the complex compliance requirements of the [[software license]]/[[permission culture]], noticed by more code being posted into repositories without any license whatsoever, implying a disregard for the current license regimes, including [[copyleft]] as supporter of the current [[copyright]] system ("[[Copyright reform movement]]").
 
==History==
"POSS" was first used by James Governor, founder of analyst firm RedMonk, who said<ref>{{cite web|url=https://twitter.com/monkchips/status/247584170967175169|title=Dai Jesting|work=Twitter}}</ref> ''"younger devs today are about POSS – Post open-source software. fuck the license and governance, just commit to github."''<ref name="infoworld">{{cite web|url=http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source-software/github-needs-take-open-source-seriously-208046 |title=GitHub needs to take open source seriously |author=Simon Phipps|publisher=Infoworld|date=30 November 2012|accessdate=30 January 2013}}</ref> According to [[Luis Villa]], when even ''"...the open license ecosystem assumes that sharing can't (or even shouldn't) happen without explicit permission in the form of licenses"'', developers vote their dissent through POSS.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://tieguy.org/blog/2013/01/27/taking-post-open-source-seriously-as-a-statement-about-copyright-law/ |title=Pushing back against licensing and the permission culture |publisher=tieguy.org|author=[[Luis Villa]]|year=2013}}</ref> This was mostly ineffective, since the default in international copyright law is "all rights reserved", and some dedication to the public ___domain or license is necessary if the software is to be shared with the public without legal ambiguity.
 
== Precursor ==