Talk:Universal approximation theorem: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:48, 21 April 2019

Revision as of 22:47, 6 May 2019

Line 2:

The two deep variants appear to be somewhat dubious. The citation is just a conference preceding, and it omits the proofs. If an expert knows any more reliable sources that would be ideal <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pabnau|Pabnau]] ([[User talk:Pabnau#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pabnau|contribs]]) 01:47, 21 April 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

In the last paragraph of the introduction, the result of n+1 width on continuous convex functions is stated as an "improvement" over the result of n+4 width on Lebesgue-integrable functions. Without additional knowledge of those papers, it's not clear to me why this should be considered an "improvement", since continuous convex functions are a much more restrictive class, and the network width difference is not asymptotically significant.