Content deleted Content added
Summarizing close statement, choice for new page and fact that consensus has been reached. |
Redo comment with signature in the correct place |
||
Line 18:
* Hello [[User:Kronhjorten|Kronhjorten]], thanks for your comment. I can agree that my original suggestion wasn't ideal. A fixed field accelerator could refer to cyclotrons as well, and we want to capture the concept of an accelerator that uses quadrupoles for focussing. What do you think about [[Fixed Field alternating gradient Accelerator (FFA)]]? I would also agree with your suggestion of [[Fixed Field alternating gradient accelerator]], and then changing the acronym in the article (which will need to be done in any case. I'm not very familiar with this move process, so I appreciate the help in this. [[User:Boazhsan|Boazhsan]] ([[User talk:Boazhsan|talk]]) 19:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Since there are no further comments, and it has been over a week, I will attempt to close and move this. The opposition by [[User:Kronhjorten|Kronhjorten]] requested another name for the page. I will take a closely related choice for new page name which is used in the beam dynamics newsletter 76: [[Fixed-Field alternating gradient Accelerator]]. The acronym FFA will be used in the article. Because this was the only discussion and opposition, I will assume we have reached resolution and go ahead and close and move the page. [[User:Boazhsan|Boazhsan]] ([[User talk:Boazhsan|talk]]) 20:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
| |||