Revision as of 07:43, 29 April 2019 edit ApprehensiveAndroid (talk \| contribs) 56 edits →Open requests ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:46, 2 May 2019 edit undo Kvng (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers 116,085 edits →Assessment requests: close request with no change after discussion Next edit →
Line 40: # <s>{{article\| Computer literacy}} is for some reason designated as being of '''top''' importance. As a '''general area of knowledge''', and to be honest given its apparent wishy-washyness, hardly even that, I would '''demote''' it to ≤ '''high importance'''. I understand why it's of top importance to the education project, but it's awfully vague to be of top importance in something as structured as computing.[[User:Ethanpet113\|Ethanpet113]] ([[User talk:Ethanpet113\|talk]]) 20:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)</s> Now '''High''' importance for Computing. ~[[User:Kvng\|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng\|talk]]) 14:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC) # <s>{{article\|Acorn Computers}} Under the criteria "major companies and people" this article should be '''promoted to top importance''' [[User:Ethanpet113\|Ethanpet113]] ([[User talk:Ethanpet113\|talk]]) 20:20, 8 December 2018 (UTC)</s> Current '''Mid''' importance rating for Computing project seems reasonable. Sure, [[Apple Inc.]] and [[Microsoft]] have a Top rating, but they have survived. There's a comparison to [[Fairchild Semiconductor]] and that also has Mid importance ratings. ~[[User:Kvng\|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng\|talk]]) 14:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC) # <s>{{article\|Racket (programming language)}} As an influential programming language (Clojure, Rust, Scheme) this article importance should be reassessed. [[User:spdegabrielle\|spdegabrielle]] ([[User talk:spdegabrielle\|talk]]) 11:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)</s> Current Low rating seems appropriate in context and after discussion. ~[[User:Kvng\|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng\|talk]]) 13:46, 2 May 2019 (UTC) #: {{re\|spdegabrielle}} [[Clojure]] and [[Scheme (programming language)]] have a Low rating. What makes Racket more important? [[Lisp (programming language)]] and [[Rust (programming language)]] have Mid ratings so you'd have to argue that Racket is on the same level. ~[[User:Kvng\|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng\|talk]]) 14:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC) #:: {{re\|kvng}} Racket (along with Haskell) is a influence on major emerging languages like Rust and Clojure, as well as being an an influence on the evolution of established languages like Java, C++, Python & JavaScript. ~[[User:spdegabrielle\|spdegabrielle]] 28 Feb 2019

Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/Assessment: Difference between revisions