Dynamic theory of gravity: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 81.225.196.192 (talk) to last version by Pjacobi
Line 46:
Tesla's 1937 announcement appears to have made little or no impression upon contemporary physicists, perhaps because his statement appears to have been too vague to guess very much about the nature of his alleged theory, and appears to have been couched in language which was already receding into the distant past.
 
Extensive experimental testing of general relativity did not begin until about [[1960]]; furthermore, essential theoretical features of general relativity were not well understood until about this time. (See [[Golden age of general relativity]] for more information about events in the period 1960-1975 which firmly established general relativity as our gold standard theory of gravitation.) Therefore, in 1937 general relativity had not quite so solid an experimental footing as it has today. By 1937 most astronomers and physicists had long accepted that general relativity gives an accurate description of solar system dynamics to within the accuracy of observation and experiment. Tesla's murky description of his unified field theory could perhaps have been described as ''fringe science'' in 1937. HoweverToday notit enoughcould informationonly existsbe todaydescribed to test his theory, therefore the argument is moot. General Relativity itself, being a mathematical theory,as ''[[not derived from empirical (direct experimental) science, has also not been proveneven conclusivelywrong]]''.
 
== See also ==