Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/Assessment: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:46, 2 May 2019

Revision as of 13:47, 2 May 2019

Line 38:

# {{article|Ethernet}} - potential promotion to B-class - ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 18:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

# {{article|Category 5 cable}} - potential promotion to B-class ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 16:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

# <s>{{article| Computer literacy}} is for some reason designated as being of '''top''' importance. As a '''general area of knowledge''', and to be honest given its apparent wishy-washyness, hardly even that, I would '''demote''' it to ≤ '''high importance'''. I understand why it's of top importance to the education project, but it's awfully vague to be of top importance in something as structured as computing.[[User:Ethanpet113|Ethanpet113]] ([[User talk:Ethanpet113|talk]]) 20:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)</s> Now '''High''' importance for Computing. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

# <s>{{article|Acorn Computers}} Under the criteria "major companies and people" this article should be '''promoted to top importance''' [[User:Ethanpet113|Ethanpet113]] ([[User talk:Ethanpet113|talk]]) 20:20, 8 December 2018 (UTC)</s> Current '''Mid''' importance rating for Computing project seems reasonable. Sure, [[Apple Inc.]] and [[Microsoft]] have a Top rating, but they have survived. There's a comparison to [[Fairchild Semiconductor]] and that also has Mid importance ratings. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

# <s>{{article|Racket (programming language)}} As an influential programming language (Clojure, Rust, Scheme) this article importance should be reassessed. [[User:spdegabrielle|spdegabrielle]] ([[User talk:spdegabrielle|talk]]) 11:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)</s> Current Low rating seems appropriate in context and after discussion. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 13:46, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

#: {{re|spdegabrielle}} [[Clojure]] and [[Scheme (programming language)]] have a Low rating. What makes Racket more important? [[Lisp (programming language)]] and [[Rust (programming language)]] have Mid ratings so you'd have to argue that Racket is on the same level. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)